Friday, June 29, 2018

Sub Section 3.3.1: The Government Monitoring Senior Committee.

(A)
The Government Monitoring Senior Committee is the highest government authority in regards to conducting censure, impeachment and audit against Human Resource of the Commonwealth. The Government Monitoring Senior Committee should have thirty-two members, including a Senior Committee Chairman, a Senior Committee Vice Chairman, ten Class A Government Monitoring Senior Committee Member, ten Class B Government Monitoring Senior Committee Member and ten Class C Government Monitoring Senior Committee Member.

(B)
The Government Monitoring Senior Committee Chairman and the Government Monitoring Senior Committee Vice Chairman should be a candidate proposed by the Vice Chancellor and approved by the Senate or the House of Representative, such Chairman and Vice Chairman should serve a six years term.

(C)
The Class A Government Monitoring Senior Committee Member should serve a term that expires upon the end of the second year of the Class B Government Monitoring Senior Committee Member, which should expire upon the end of the fourth year of the Class C Government Monitoring Senior Committee Member, the Class C Government Monitoring Senior Committee Member, should serve a six years term. Class A Senior Government Monitoring Committee member should be a candidate proposed by the Government Monitoring Senior Committee Chairman and approved by the Prime Minister. Class B Senior Government Monitoring Committee member should be a candidate proposed by the Government Monitoring Senior Committee Chairman and approved by the Senate. Class C Senior Government Monitoring Committee member should be a candidate proposed by the Government Monitoring Senior Committee Chairman and approved by the House of Representative.

(D)
For the Government Monitoring Senior Committee to propose a case of impeachment towards a federal government human resource, local government human resource or a justice of the Federal High Court, it must first be proposed by at least two members of the Government Monitoring Senior Committee and investigate by a panel of at least nine Government Monitoring Senior Committee members, members of the panel should elect one of its member to become its chairman. After the panel complete the investigation it can decide to propose a case of impeachment, if felt necessary. But if the Government Monitoring Senior Committee is to propose a case of impeachment towards the Prime Minister, it got to be proposed by at least a quarter of all member of the Government Monitoring Senior Committee and investigate by a panel that include at least half of all Government Monitoring Senior Committee members, after the investigation, if the panel felt an impeachment proposal is necessary, it should announce it to the Parliament.

(E)
When the Government Monitoring Senior Committee is conducting any investigation, it should and can retrieve all orders and document relevant to the case. After the Government Monitoring Senior Committee completed an investigation it should make correction recommendation, such recommendation should be send to the House of Administration and any other relevant government organization. If the Government Monitoring Senior Committee felt the human resource been investigated has neglect his duty or has done something illegal, it should present correction recommendation or census, if it is related to criminal offense, the case should be sent to the judicatory branch of the Commonwealth government.

(G)
The Government Monitoring Senior Committee should have various Government Monitoring Committees, subject to it, in accordance to government monitoring needs, in reference to the government structure of the Commonwealth, each Government Monitoring Committee, should have ten members including one Chairman and one Vice Chairman. The Chairman of the Government Monitoring Committee should be a member of the Government Monitoring Senior Committee proposed by the Government Monitoring Senior Committee Chairman and approved by the Senate or the House of Representative, other members of the Committee should be a candidate proposed by its Chairman and approved by the Vice Chancellor.

(H)
There can be no more than five members of the Government Monitoring Senior Committee that belongs to the same political party or union and the Government Monitoring Senior Committee must include members that are neither a member of a political party or union. Whenever, the Government Monitoring Senior Committee has up to five members of the same political party or union, any other person whom are member of such political party or union, must resign from such political party or union, before becoming a member of the Government Monitoring Senior Committee and if any existing member of the Government Monitoring Senior Committee want to become a member of such political party or union, he must resign from been a member of the Government Monitoring Senior Committee, before he can join the party or union.

(I)
A person who is a member of the Government Monitoring Senior Committee should not hold any other position within the Federal or Local Government of the Commonwealth or Business organization

Subject to above, the criteria to become a member of the Government Monitoring Senior Committee should be the same as the criteria to become a member of the Senate and all of those that qualify to become a member of the Senate, also qualify to become a member of the Government Monitoring Senior Committee

(K)
The Government Monitoring Senior Committee can have various government monitoring agencies subject to it. The nature of such agencies is determined by the law and the constitution of the Commonwealth. The officer appointed to administer such agency should not be a member of the Government Monitoring Senior Committee and should

1. Have no criminal record by the Commonwealth
2. Not be a current Official or General Personnel of an armed force, ministry, department, sub department, administration committee or administration subcommittee of the Commonwealth 
3. be over the age of forty
4. Be appointed by been a candidate proposed by the chairman of the Government Monitoring Senior Committee and agree upon by the Senate or the House of Representative and
5. Be a Chief Official within this agency

All people who meet these criteria can be appointed to become the officer administering this agency

(L)
Each Agency and Government Monitoring Committee can have various Sub Agency subject to it and each Government Monitoring Committee can have various Government Monitoring Sub Committee been subject to it. The Officer appointed to administer such Agency or Government Monitoring Committee, should be a candidate proposed by the Officer administers such Agency or Government Monitoring Committee, such Sub Agency or Government Monitoring Sub Committee is subject to and approved by the Vice Chancellor. 

(M)
Amount such agencies, subject to the Government Monitoring Senior Committee, it should include one government monitoring intelligence and investigation agency, such agency should be known as the Jinyiwei Command Division and an agent of such agency should be known as a Jinyiwei錦衣衛, it is name after the first known federal intelligence and investigation agency of such in history, the Jinyiwei Command Division 錦衣衛指揮使司, of the Ming Empire and federal intelligence and investigation agencies that are similar to such during the time where the constitution reform is made, include the Federal Bureau Investigation (FBI) and Naval Crime Investigation Service (NCIS) of the United States of America.

The Jinyiwei Command Divisions should be the highest government monitoring intelligence and investigative agency, subject to the Government Monitoring Senior Committee for Human Resource of the Commonwealth and other organizations working for the Commonwealth, in events relevant to such employment.

Subject to the Office of the Prime Minister and Acting Prime Minister and organizations subject to the Office of the Prime Minister and Acting Prime Minister the Jinyiwei Command Division is the highest security and policing agency for the

1. Bases of organizations working for the Commonwealth, if such base for this organization is upon the territory of the Commonwealth. 
2. Bases of the Federal and Local government of the Commonwealth and
3. Bases of the Armed Forces of the Commonwealth.

The broader mandate of a Jinyiwei and the Jinyiwei Command Division can also include,
1. Protecting the Prime Minister, Acting Prime Minister or Deputy Prime Minister
2. Protecting the Parliament
3. Assist in national security duties in regards to intelligent, counter intelligent, security, investigation, combat and policing.
4. Perform academic research and development in intelligence, counter intelligence, investigation, security, combat and policing skills and technology
5. Educate Jinyiwei and other relevant organizations of the Commonwealth in intelligence, counter intelligence, investigation, security, combat and policing skills and technology.

The Jinyiweis Command Division should be split into that of Northern Head Office, Southern Head Office and Management Head Office. The Northern Head Office (北鎮撫司) is responsible for the investigation and intelligent gathering upon Officials and General Personnel of the House of Administration and Local Governments of the Commonwealth. The Southern Head Office (南鎮撫司) is responsible for the investigation and intelligent gathering upon Officials and General Personnel of the Armed Forces of the Commonwealth. The Management Head Office (經歷司) is responsible for the management , backup and saving of Jinyiwei Command Division documents. The Northern Head Office and the Southern Head Office can have Field Offices subject to it. The person appointed to administer the Northern Head Office or the Southern Head Office, must be a Jinyiwei and a Chief Official within the Jinyiwei Command Division.

To ensure those who become Jinyiwei have the ethic and wisdom require performing his duty. The broader mandate of a Jinyiwei must also be willing to receive continue practical and theoretical training and education as an intelligent, counter intelligent, combat, security, policing and investigation expert. Those who become a Jinyiwei must have no criminal record.

The concept of the Jinyiwei Command Division and Jinyiwei is inspire by the

1. Jinyiwei Command Division錦衣衛指揮使司of the Ming Empire 明 (China and Eastern Manchuria 1368AC~1644AC)
2. The Naval Crime Investigation Service of the United States of America during the time where this constitution reform was made and
3. Federal Bureau of Investigation of the United States of America during the time where this constitution reform was made.

And what make these dynasties a success.

(N)
In regards to what to do this section of this constitutional reform is created in reference to the Control Yuan (監察院) of the Republic of China 中華民國 (Taiwan), which is created in reference to the Ministry of Monitoring Censorship (監察御史) of the Ming Empire.


Posted by at No comments:

Sub Section 3.3.2: Ministry of Government Auditing


(A)
The House of Human Resource should have a Ministry of Government Auditing, such Ministry should be administering by the Government Auditor General, the person serving as the Government Auditor General is a candidate proposed by the Vice Chancellor and approved by the Senate or the House of Representative

(B) 
Within four months after the financial year, the House of Administration and the House of Armed Forces should present the account of House of Administration and House of Armed Forces to the Ministry of Government Auditing. Within three months after the House of Administration and the House of Armed Forces hand in such accounts, the Ministry of Government Auditing should complete checking the accounts, in accordance to the law and present the checking report to the Grand Senate.

(C)

In regards to what to do this section of this constitutional reform is created in reference to the Control Yuan (監察院) of the Republic of China 中華民國 (Taiwan)




Posted by at No comments:

Section 3.4: Reference


(A)
The Executive Government Structure of the Commonwealth, in accordance to the constitutional reform of this article should be known as the Three Houses and Six Ministries Executive Government Structure of the Commonwealth of Australia.

In regards to what to do the Three Houses and Six Ministries Executive Government Structure of the Commonwealth is created in reference to the Three Houses and Six Ministries Executive Government Structure (三省六部制) of the Tang Empire 唐(China and Vietnam 618AC~907AC), Song Empire 宋(China 960AC~1279AC) and Ming Empire明 (China and Eastern Manchuria 1368AC~1644AC) and what lead to the success of these dynasties.

(B)
In regards to what not to do, the Three Houses and Six Ministries Executive Government Structure of the Commonwealth, is created, observing the problems associated with the Qing Empire 清 (China, Manchuria, Mongolia, Xinjiang, Tibet, parts of South East Russia, Taiwan and Hainan 1644~1911) and what make this dynasty a failure, especially how the policy of the Qing Empire, trying to secure its power by abolishing all previous government structure and 

1. replacing it with a six houses structure, where the office of the Emperor, hold all power and responsibility of the Federal government and the six houses of the Federal Government can only act as advisers and 

2. radically decrease the power of all local governments, 

resulting in an over monopolization government structure and as a result, the eighteenth century British ambassador to then China once referred to the Qing Empire as a giant ship with only one sailor, for now the ship is sailing fine, but if the sailor become dizzy for just one second, the ship would start to sink and nothing the sailor can do later could stop the sinking, which is exactly what happened by the late eighteenth century and eventually led to the total collapsed of the Qing Empire by 1911 and even before the late eighteenth century, it was struggling against total collapsed and was seen continue deterioration in all arenas, throughout the Qing Empire era and the main reason the Qing Empire was able to last so long till collapse, is due to prior to the Qing Empire, Asia has been the most powerful region in the world, for the last 2000 years, allowing the Qing Empire to last for 150 years, till the deterioration to start having any really effect. The lesson to be learn from the Qing Empire, is to avoid an over monopolized government structure.




Posted by at No comments:

Sub Section 3.3.3: The Human Resource Senior Committee

(A)
Subject to the rules already been set out by this constitution, the Human Resource Senior Committee is the highest government authority in matters relating to examination, employment, civil service, merit examination, level of pension, promotion, safe guard, commend and award, pension and retirement of the Human Resource of the Federal and Local Government of the Commonwealth.

(B)
The Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the Human Resource Senior Committee should be a candidate proposed by the Vice Chancellor and approved by the Senate or the House of Representative.

(C)
The Human Resource Senior Committee should have thirty-two members including ten 
Class A Human Resource Senior Committee Members, ten Class B Human Resource Senior Committee Members and ten Class C Human Resource Senior Committee Members. Class A Human Resource Senior Committee Members should be a candidate proposed by the Human Resource Senior Committee Chairman and approved by the Prime Minister. Class B Human Resource Senior Committee Members should be a candidate proposed by the Human Resource Senior Committee Chairman and approved by the Senate. Class C Human Resource Senior Committee Chairman should be a candidate proposed by the Human Resource Senior Committee Chairman and approved by the House of Representative

(C)
Member of the Human Resource Senior Committee cannot be limited to people who are of only a single political party and must include people who are neither a member of a political party or union.

(D)
When necessary the Human Resource Senior Committee should propose new laws, propose the removal of certain existing laws or propose reforms to the existing laws, in regards to topics, relating to its duty, to the parliament.

(E)
Subject to above, the criteria to become a member of the Human Resource Senior Committee should be the same as the criteria to become a member of the Senate and all of those that qualify to become a member of the Senate, also qualify to become a member of the Human Resource Senior Committee

(E)
The Human Resource Senior Committee can have various Human Resource agencies subject to it, to assist it in performing its duties, the nature of such agency, is determined by the law and the constitution of the Commonwealth. The Officer who is appointed to administer such agency should 

1.    Have no criminal record by the Commonwealth
2.    Not be a current Official or General Personnel of an armed force, ministry, department, sub department, administration committee or administration subcommittee of the Commonwealth 
3.    Be over the age of thirty
4.    Be appointed by been a candidate proposed by the Human Resource Senior Committee Chairman and approved by the Senate and
5.    Be a Chief Official within this agency

All people who meet these criteria can be appointed to become the officer administering this agency

(G)

In regards to what to do this section of this constitutional reform is created in reference to the Exam Yuan (考試院) of the Republic of China 中華民國 (Taiwan)

Posted by at No comments:

Article 5: Judicatory Reform


(A)
The Attorney General should replace the Governor General in Chapter Three section seventy-two of the Constitution, but a person who can be appointed to become a justice of the federal high court, must be proposed by the Attorney General to the Senate and approved by the Senate. The Prime Minister should replace the Governor General and the Queen in Chapter Three section seventy-three and section seventy-four of the constitution. 

(B)
The person who can be appointed become a justice of the Federal High Court, after this amendment should

1.    Have no criminal record by the Commonwealth
2.    Not be a current Official or General Personnel of the Commonwealth 

(C)
There can be no more than five justice of the Federal High Court who are member of the same political party, whenever, a Federal High Court has up to five justices whom are members of the same political party, any other person whom are member of such political party, must resign from such political party before becoming a justice of the Federal High Court and if any existing justices of the Federal High Court want to become a member of such political party, he must resign from been a justice.

(D)
After a person served as justice for eight years, the Attorney General can remove a person serving as justice but require approval of the absolute majority of the House of Representative and the absolute majority of the Senate. If either less than half of the members of the House of Representative or less than half of the members of the Senate approve of such dismissal, such person serving as a justice of the Federal High Court should not be dismissed and whenever over half of the Senate or over half of the House of Representative disapprove of removing a person serving as a justice of the Federal High Court, the Attorney General cannot again make a case of dismissal to remove such person from been a justice of the Federal High Court, for another eight years. When contradiction occurred between this amendment and Chapter Three section seventy-two of the Constitution, the Commonwealth should act according to this amendment. A person serving as a justice of the Federal High Court should not be removed by any other form of method, other than that presented by this constitution.

(E)
The power to define the Constitution and the law of the Commonwealth should be vest upon the Federal High Court.

(G)
The Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister has the right to grant pardon, reduce sentence and call for a mistrial, but his exercise of such power must be subject to the law of the Commonwealth and this constitution.

(H)
The Attorney General has the right to call for a mistrial and reduce sentence, but his exercise of such power must be subject to the law of the Commonwealth and this Constitution.

(I)
The Prime Minister has the right to restore a person's lost or stolen civil right and to order compensation to a person for their lost or stolen civil right, but his exercising of this power must be subject to the law of the Commonwealth and this Constitution.

(J)
Any citizen of the Commonwealth that is over the age of twenty can sue a law of the Commonwealth for violating the Constitution of the Commonwealth. Such trial should be trial by the Federal High Court and if the Federal High Court decides such law is in violation of the Constitution, such law should be abolished. Such trial should be trial by a panel of five justices, accompany by a panel of at least fifteen juries and the decision of such trial of the Federal High Court, should be determined by a vote of the five justices and agree upon by the jury, whenever the jury and the justices cannot agree with each other, there should be a retrial. But if, at least, four of the five justices voted for the same decision, the agreement of the jury is not necessary. 

(K)
Any person who is a justice of the Federal High Court, would seize been a justice, upon gaining a criminal record, by the Commonwealth

(L)
1. Juries been manipulated or emotionally compromised, due to not professionally qualified, thus, acting unfair.
2. Judges not acting appropriately as a professional, thus, acting unfair.
3. Judge or jury not acting professional or acting unfair due to prejudice or corruption.

Would increase the chance of a trial that is neither fair or just, as a result, increase the chance of guilty people get found not guilty of a crime they committed, innocent people getting found guilty of a crime they did not commit, this is unjust, unfair and a violation of human right, for victims and innocent accuse. 

Hence, to increase the chance of having a trial that is both fair and just. The trial on indictment of any offence should be co-trial by a judge and a panel of at least twelve juries, within the initial trial and initial trial after a successful appeal, such trial should be led by the judge and whenever the judge and the juries of such trial gives a different verdict, the case should be retrial, but if the judge and the juries gives the same verdict, the verdict should stand, unless successfully appealed, the juries should make their verdict first, after the juries announced their verdict to the court and the judge, the judge should make his verdict. The verdict of such initial trial should be guilty, not guilty or insufficient evidence. 

Before each appeal, there can be up to at least eleven retrials, after the initial trial and initial trial after a successful appeal, but should have no more than eleven of such retrials, before each appeal. The first ten of such eleven retrial should be co-trial by a judge and a panel of at least twelve juries, such trial should be led by the judge and whenever the judge and the juries gives a different verdict, the case should be retrial, but if the judge and the juries gives the same verdict, the verdict should stand, unless successfully appealed. The juries should make their verdict first, after the juries announced their verdict to the court and the judge, the judge should make his verdict. The verdict of such retrial should be guilty, not guilty or insufficient evidence.

The final retrial of such eleven retrial should be conducted by the Federal High Court, it should be co-trial be a panel of at least five judges and a panel of at least twelve juries, the five judges should elect one of the five judges to lead the trial, such elected judge, should lead the trial. The juries should make their verdict first, after the juries announced their verdict to the court and the panel of the five judges, the panel of the five judges should make their verdict. The verdict of such trial should be guilty, not guilty or insufficient evidence and if 

1. The verdict of both the panel of five judges and the juries for the accuse is guilty, then the verdict for the accuse, should be guilty

2. The verdict of both the panel of five judges and the juries for the accuse is not guilty, then the verdict for the accuse, should be not guilty

3. The verdict for the accuse should be insufficient evidence if

a. the verdict of the panel of five judges is guilty, but the verdict of the juries is not guilty or insufficient evidence

b. the verdict of the panel of five judges is insufficient evidence, but the verdict of the juries is guilty or not guilty

c. the verdict of the panel of five judges is not guilty, but the verdict of the juries is guilty or insufficient evidence. 

If the verdict is insufficient evidence, it should not be consider as the verdict for the accused is not guilty or guilty, but merely a verdict that conclude that there is insufficient evidence to make a guilty or not guilty decision.

All accuse should be consider to be innocent until proven guilty.

(M)
With the exception of soldiers

1. Such initial trial, initial trial after a successful appeal and such first two retrials should be held by the judicatory branch of the District where the offense was committed and if the offence was not committed within any District the trial shall be held by the judicatory branch of the Province such offense was committed and if the offence was not committed within any Province the trial shall be held by the judicatory branch of such State it was committed and if the offence was not committed within any State the trial shall be held by the Federal High Court. 

2. Such third, fourth and fifth retrial should be held by the judicatory branch of the Federal District, State District or Province where the offense was committed and if the offence was not committed within any District or Province the trial shall be held by the judicatory branch of such State it was committed and if the offence was not committed within any State the trial shall be held by the Federal High Court. 

3. Such sixth, seventh and eighth retrial should be held by the judicatory branch of the Federal District or State where the offense was committed and if the offence was not committed within any State or District the trial shall be held by the Federal High Court. 

4. Such ninth, tenth and eleventh retrial should be held by the Federal High Court.

If the person who committed the offense is an Official or General Personnel of the Armed Force of the Commonwealth, the initial trial and first eight retrials should be held by the military court, the last three retrials should be held by the Federal High Court

Chapter Three Section eighty of the constitution should no longer be used.

(M)
Police investigators not properly investigating the case before making a person the accuse of a criminal offense, can dramatically increase the chance of innocent people going to prison and guilty people getting away for a crime he committed, this is especially the case, if the police did not even investigate the case at all and even more especially if the police not only did not properly investigate the case or did not investigate the case at all, but is only interest in looking for example and constructing opinions in favour of the believe of who they concluded to be guilty and ignore all contradicting evidence, withhold all contradicting evidence or sabotage the possible emergence of contradicting evidence. This is both unfair and unjust for both the accuse if he is innocent and the victim, as it mean, an innocent person is accuse of committing a criminal offense and probably been found guilty for it, while the real guilty party get away, due to the authority responsible for it, cannot be bother to properly do his job.

Hence, to the best of the ability of this constitution to ensure the investigator has to the best of their ability properly investigated the case, a person can only be charged for criminal offense, by a public prosecutor of the Commonwealth or a State, District, Province or military court, but no person other than Officials and General Personnel of the Armed force can be charged by prosecutor of the military court, such prosecutor should be a member of the judicatory branch of the Commonwealth, military court or such State, District or Province. The public prosecutor can only charge a person for criminal offense, after the police, Jinyiwei or Government Monitoring Senior Committee or other organizations deem fit by the law to investigate the case, has investigate the case. Before the case can go to trial for criminal charges, the prosecutor need to provide the court with reports of the investigation of the case and the judge leading the trial must be satisfy all necessary investigation has been properly conducted and is been properly conducted to the level of satisfaction of such judge and all report of such investigation has been properly conducted and handed in to the court and is been properly conducted to the level of satisfaction of such judge, otherwise the judge can have the charges dismissed or order further investigation of the case, including ordering certain specific investigations, to allow the charges not to be dismissed.

If the judge leading the trial at any stage of the trial believe not all relevant investigation has been properly conducted or is not properly conducted to the level of satisfaction of the judge or the investigation report of such investigation handed in to the court is not properly conducted or is not properly conducted to the level of satisfactory of such judge, the judge can dismiss the charges or order further investigation of the case, including ordering certain specific investigations, for the charges not to be dismissed.

If the criminal charges been laid against the accuse, is in regards to murder or manslaughter the investigation report been handed in to the court must also include crime scene investigation reports and autopsy reports of the deceased, if either one of the two is missing, the judge leading the trial must be satisfy gaining access to conduct crime scene investigation or autopsy is not possible and the prosecutor has also to the best of his ability gain access to crime scene investigation reports and autopsy reports and a judge can order for the case to be re-investigated if such judge believe access to crime scene investigation or autopsy has become available, after the re-investigation has been order, if the accused already been found guilty of such criminal offense is not again been charged for such criminal offense, within three years, the decision of the previous trial that found him guilty of such criminal offense should be null and the charges against him should be dropped, if such person is again been charged for such criminal offense, there should be a re-trial and decision of such trial should replace the decision of the previous trial. 

In regards to missing person, the policy of the Commonwealth should be "To find the missing person dead or alive" (活要見人死要見屍策略). The missing person case should remain open regardless of circumstances until the missing person has been found dead or alive. This is because just because a person is assumed dead it does not mean he is dead and even if the person is assumed murder and a person has been charged and found guilty of the murder, it does not necessary mean such person been found guilty is the killer or if such person assumed murder is dead and such person assumed murder might for example still be alive and is been kidnapped and is been locked away in a dungeon as a sex slave, by a third party completely unrelated to the person that has been charged and found guilty for murdering her, thus, making it a great unjust for both the missing person and the person in prison for her murder, while the person who kidnapped her and is locking her in a dungeon as a sex slave is getting away for such crime. Even worse if a corrupt investigator took bribe from criminal organization and charged a man for murdering his attractive looking young wife for the insurance money, to cover for the criminal organization, whom kidnap and sold the wife into underground sex trafficking and the jury found the husband guilty of murder, not only is it a great unjust for this couple, but what would make it an even greater unjust, is if the policy of the police is to stop looking for her afterwards, considering, if the missing person case remain open, by another unrelated police investigator, then at least it is possible that the wife could be found and rescue from sex trafficking and her husband would be release from prison for her murder.

This is especially considering there have been cases of people been charged and found guilty of murder within the Commonwealth, with little or no evidence and sometime such little evidences are highly circumstantial evidences and later it found out the person thought to be murder, is not even dead, but a missing person assumed dead, but is in fact very much alive.

(N)

In regards to what to do this article of this constitutional reform observe the judicatory branch of the United States of America and the Republic of China 中華民國 (Taiwan)
Posted by at No comments:

Article 4: Local Government

(A)
Subject to the Federal government, the territory of the Commonwealth can be split into that of State(州/省), Federal District(直轄市) and Federal Capital. Subject to the State, territory of a State can be split into that of State Capital, State District(省轄市/州轄市) and Province(縣). Subject to the Province, territory of the Province can be split into that of Province Capital, Province District(縣轄市), Town(鎮) and County(鄉).

(B)
The term District(市) should be a general reference to Federal District, State District, and Province District.

(C)
Subject to the Districts, territory of the Districts can be split into Sub District(區) and Special Sub District(原住民區)

(D)

The term Capital should be a general reference to Federal Capital, State Capital and Province Capital.



Posted by at No comments:

Section 4.1: District, State and Province

(A)
The government of the Districts, States and Provinces should include a legislative branch, judicatory branch and an executive branch. The power of the executive branch should be vast on the Premier. The power of the legislative branch should be vast in its parliament which should include the Premier and a Senate. 

All Voting Citizen of such District, State or Province, has the right to vote and each vote is equal is worth. The candidate who received the most votes, should be elected as the Premier

(B)
The Premier of

1. A State or a Federal District must be over the age of thirty-five.
2. A Province, State District or a Province District must be over the age of thirty.

No person who has been elected as the Premier of a State, District or Province twice can again be candidate for the position of Premier of such State, District or Province.

Subject to above all people can be elected to become the Premier of a State, District or Province if he is

1.    A citizen of the Commonwealth, who is a Voting Citizen of such District, State or Province, 
2.    Got no criminal record by the Commonwealth
3.    Got no criminal record by such State, District or Province
4.    Got no criminal record by any State or Province, such Province or District is subject to
5.    Is elected by citizens of the Commonwealth whom are Voting Citizen of the District, State or Province. 
6.    Not a current Official or General Personnel of any armed force of the Commonwealth 

But no person who does not meet the criteria set out above should be elected as a Premier of a State, District or Province. 

(C)
All citizen of the Commonwealth age sixteen or over and got no criminal record, got the right to be a Voting Citizen of a Capital, a District or a State, if he is a resident within such Capital, such District or such State and has been a resident within such Capital, such District or such State, for at least the last three years. All citizen of the Commonwealth age sixteen or over and got no criminal record, has the right to be the Voting Citizen of at least one Capital or one District or one State. But no person, who is less than sixteen years old or is not a citizen of the Commonwealth, can be the Voting Citizen of a Capital, District or State.

(D)
All citizen of the Commonwealth age sixteen or over and got no criminal record and is the Voting Citizen of such State, has the right to be a Voting Citizen of a Capital, District or Province of such State, if he is a resident within such Capital, such District or such Province and has been a resident within such Capital, such District or such Province, for at least the last three years and all citizen of the Commonwealth age sixteen or over and got no criminal record and is the Voting Citizen of the State, has the right to be the Voting Citizen of at least one Capital or one District or at least one Province of such State. But no person, who is less than sixteen years old or is not a citizen of the Commonwealth or is not a Voting Citizen of such State, can be the Voting Citizen of a Capital or a District or a Province of such State.

(E)
1. No person who is a Voting Citizen of the Federal Capital can be the Voting Citizen of a District or State. 
2. No person who is a Voting Citizen of a Federal District can be the Voting Citizen of a State or a Capital. 
3. No person who is a Voting Citizen of a State can be the Voting Citizen of the Federal Capital or a Federal District. 
4. No person who is a Voting Citizen of the State Capital can be the Voting Citizen of the Federal Capital or a District. 
5. No person who is a Voting Citizen of a State District can be the Voting Citizen of a Capital or a Province. 
6. No person who is a Voting Citizen of a Province can be the Voting Citizen of the Federal Capital, a State Capital, a Federal District or a State District. 
7. No person can be the Voting Citizen of more than one Capital, State, District or Province.

(G)
The Federal Districts and States are allowed to have its own constitution, but aspect of its constitution that contradict the constitution of the Commonwealth, should be deemed as invalid. The Federal Districts and States are allowed to have its own law, but aspect of its law that contradict the law or constitution of the Commonwealth, should be abolished.

(H)
The State Districts and Provinces are allowed to have its own constitution, but aspect of its constitution that contradict the constitution of the Commonwealth or the State it belongs to, should be deemed as invalid. The State Districts and Provinces are allowed to have its own law, but aspect of its law that contradict the constitution or law of the Commonwealth or the State it belongs to, should be abolished.

(H)
Province Districts are allowed to have its own constitution, but aspect of its constitution that contradict the constitution of the Commonwealth or the State or the Province it belongs to, should be deemed as invalid. Province Districts are allowed to have its own law, but aspect of its law that contradict the constitution or law of the Commonwealth or the State or the Province it belongs to, should be abolished.

(I)
Whether the constitution and law of a Province, District or State is in contradiction to the constitution or law of the Commonwealth should be determined by the Federal High Court. All citizen of the Commonwealth that is over the age of twenty can sue aspect of the law or constitution of a State, District or Province to be in violation of the law or constitution of the Commonwealth, the ruling should be done by the Federal High Court. Such trial should be trial by a panel of five justices, accompany by a panel of at least fifteen juries and the decision of such trial of the Federal High Court, should be determined by a vote of the five justices and agree upon by the jury, whenever the jury and the justices cannot agree with each other, there should be a retrial. But if, at least, four of the five justices voted for the same decision, the agreement of the jury is not necessary. 

(J)
The area size of a District should be no larger than 3000km2 and no smaller than 500km2. A territory of the Commonwealth that is no larger than 3000km2 and no smaller than 500km2 in size, can become a Federal District when it got a population over 1 million citizens of the Commonwealth, a State District when it got a population over five hundred thousand citizens of the Commonwealth, if it is a part of a State, a Province District when it got a population over one hundred thousand citizens of the Commonwealth, if it is a part of a Province.

(K)
A Federal District can become a part of a State and downgraded to become a State District, when its population dropped below five hundred thousand citizens of the Commonwealth. A Federal District and a State District can become a part of a Province and downgraded to become a Province District, when its population dropped below one hundred thousand citizens of the Commonwealth. A Federal District, a State District and a Province District can be downgrade to become a Town or a County or a part of a Town or County, when its population dropped below fifty thousand citizens of the Commonwealth.

(L)
A State District and a Province District can be upgrade to become a Federal District once its population of Commonwealth citizen reached over 1 million, in which, the District would no longer be a part of a State or a Province. A Province District can be upgrade to become a State District once its population of Commonwealth citizen reached over five hundred thousand, in which, the District would no longer be a part of a Province.

(M)
Upon becoming a Province District, Voting Citizens of such District would automatically become Voting Citizens of such Province and such State, it belongs to. Upon becoming a part of a State District, a Voting Citizen of such District would automatically become a Voting Citizens of such State it belongs to and seize been the Voting Citizen of any Province. Upon becoming a Federal District, Voting Citizens of such District would automatically seize been the Voting Citizens of any State or Province.

(N)
Subject to the Premier, the Executive Government of a Federal District and a State should be split into six ministries including

1. The Ministry of Finance and Internal Affair
2. The Ministry of Public Relationship and Public Education
3. The Ministry of Security.
4. The Ministry of Justice
5. The Ministry of Executive Government Human Resource
6. The Ministry of Public Service and Infrastructure

Each ministry can have various department and administration committee been subject to it. Each department and each administration committee can have various sub department and administration subcommittee subject to it.

The Officer appointed to administer
1. A ministry should be appointed by the Premier, he should be known as a Senior Minister
2. A department or administration committee should be appointed by the officer appointed to administering such ministry, the department or administration committee is subject to and approved by the Premier
3. Such officer appointed to administer a sub department or administration subcommittee, should be a candidate proposed by the officer administering the department or administration committee such sub department or administration subcommittee, is subject to and approved by the Premier

Such officer administering the Ministry of Justice should also be known as an Attorney General.

(O)
The Executive Government of a State District and a Province should have various departments and administration committees. Each department can have various sub department and administration subcommittee subject to it. Each administration committee can have various administration subcommittees subject to it. The officer administering 

1.     A department or administration committee should be appointed by the Premier. 
2.    The officer appointed to administer a sub department or an administration subcommittee, should be a candidate propose by the officer administering such department or administration committee, the sub department or administration subcommittee is subject to and approved by the Premier

(P)
The Executive Government of a Province District should have various department and administration committees subject to it, such officer administers such department or administration committee, should be appointed by the Premier. 

(Q)
Such officer appointed administer a ministry, department, administration committee, sub department or administration subcommittee of a State, District or a Province, should be a member of the Executive Council of such, State, District or Province, he should be over the age of thirty.

(R)
The Justice of the judicatory branch of a State or a Federal District should be candidates propose by its Attorney General and approved by its Senate. 


The Justice of the judicatory branch of a Province, a Province District or a State District, should be a candidate propose by its Premier and approved by its Senate.

(S)
All people can be a member of the Executive Council of a State, District or Province and can be elected to become the member of a Senate of a State, District or Province if he is
1.    A citizen of the Commonwealth, who is a Voting Citizen of such District, State or Province, 
2.    Got no criminal record by the Commonwealth
3.    Got no criminal record by such State, District or Province
4.    Got no criminal record by the State or Province such Province or District is subject to. 
5.    Is over the age of thirty
6.    Not a current Official or General Personnel of any armed force of the Commonwealth 

But no person who does not meet the criteria set out above should be a member of the Executive Council a State, District or Province or be elected as a member of the Senate of a State, District or Province. 

(T)
No person can administer more than one ministry, department, sub department, administration committee or administration subcommittee of a State, District or Province, 

(U)
The Senate of 

1. A State should have at least fifty Senators, but no more than one hundred Senators, with at least one representative per Province and State District. The number of State District and Provinces combine should not be more than fifty

2. A Province should have at least twenty Senators, but no more than fifty Senators, there should be at least one Senator per Province District, Town or County, the number of Province District, Town and County combine should not be more than twenty. 

3. a Federal District should have at least fifty Senators, with at least one Senator per Sub District and Special Sub District, but no more than one hundred Senators, unless its number of Sub District and Special Sub District combine is more than one hundred, in which, the number of Senator should be equal to the number of Sub District and Special Sub District combine.

4. a State District should have at least twenty Senators, with at least one Senator per Sub District and Special Sub District, but no more than fifty Senators, unless its number of Sub District and Special Sub District combine is more than fifty, in which, the number of Senator should be equal to the number of Sub District and Special Sub District combine.

5. a Province District should have at least twelve Senators, with at least one Senator per Sub District and Special Sub District, but no more than twelve Senators, unless its number of Sub District and Special Sub District combine is more than twelve, in which, the number of Senator should be equal to the number of Sub District and Special Sub District combine.

(V)
The Premier of a State, District or Province should serve a term that is four years till expire.

(W)

The Senate of a State, Province or District should serve a term that is three years till expire.

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)